ONTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KLA has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 35.53%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 48.83%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $789.77 which suggests that it could fall by -4.77%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than KLA.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.703%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.50x while KLA's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.81x versus 9.65x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plexus has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 3.99%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Plexus's return on equity of 10.94%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 48.83%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $153.40 which suggests that it could grow by 13.66%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Plexus, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Plexus.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.839%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than Plexus quarterly revenues of $980.2M. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is higher than Plexus's net income of $39.1M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.50x while Plexus's PE ratio is 26.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.81x versus 0.94x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 3.24%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 48.83%. On the other hand Sanmina has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.07%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Sanmina.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.951%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanmina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than Sanmina quarterly revenues of $2B. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is lower than Sanmina's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.50x while Sanmina's PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.81x versus 0.63x for Sanmina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolfspeed has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of -153.99%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Wolfspeed's return on equity of -178.72%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 48.83%. On the other hand Wolfspeed has an analysts' consensus of $4.14 which suggests that it could grow by 185.72%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Onto Innovation, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Onto Innovation.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.94%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolfspeed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolfspeed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are larger than Wolfspeed quarterly revenues of $185.4M. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is higher than Wolfspeed's net income of -$285.5M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.50x while Wolfspeed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.81x versus 0.26x for Wolfspeed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.